Responder LLMNR Poisoning

LLMNR (Link-Local Multicast Name Resolution) poisoning is a network attack where hackers exploit Windows systems attempting to resolve hostnames when DNS lookups fail.

This guide explains how LLMNR poisoning works and shows you how to protect your network against this common attack vector.

What is LLMNR?

LLMNR serves as a backup name resolution protocol that Windows uses when DNS resolution fails to identify hostnames.

How LLMNR Poisoning Works

  • A user attempts to access a network resource using an incorrect or mistyped hostname
  • DNS resolution fails, triggering LLMNR/NBT-NS broadcasts
  • Attacker responds to these broadcasts, impersonating the requested resource
  • Target system sends authentication credentials to the attacker
  • Attacker captures and cracks the NTLMv2 hash offline

Common Attack Tools

  • Responder – Most popular tool for LLMNR poisoning
  • Metasploit’s auxiliary/spoof/llmnr/llmnr_response
  • Inveigh – PowerShell-based LLMNR/NBT-NS spoofer

Detection & Prevention

  • Disable LLMNR through Group Policy: Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > Network > DNS Client > Turn Off Multicast Name Resolution
  • Disable NBT-NS: Network Adapter Properties > IPv4 Properties > Advanced > WINS tab > Disable NetBIOS over TCP/IP
  • Use strong password policies requiring complex passwords
  • Monitor network traffic for suspicious LLMNR/NBT-NS activity
  • Implement Network Access Control (NAC)

Mitigation Steps for System Administrators

Action Implementation
DNS Configuration Ensure proper DNS server settings across all devices
Network Segmentation Implement VLANs and network isolation
Monitoring Deploy IDS/IPS solutions to detect poisoning attempts

Testing for LLMNR Vulnerabilities

Use these tools responsibly and only on networks you have permission to test:

  • Responder: python Responder.py -I eth0 -wrfv
  • Wireshark: Filter for LLMNR packets using llmnr filter
  • Nmap: Scan for NBT-NS services with nmap -sV -p137 target-ip

Contact your network security team or a qualified penetration tester if you need help assessing your network’s vulnerability to LLMNR poisoning.

Additional Resources

Incident Response

If LLMNR poisoning is detected on your network, follow these immediate response steps:

  • Identify and isolate affected systems
  • Reset compromised credentials
  • Collect and analyze network logs
  • Document the incident timeline
  • Implement additional security controls

Advanced Protection Measures

Network Hardening

  • Deploy 802.1X authentication
  • Implement DNS sinkholing
  • Use DNSSEC where possible
  • Configure SMB signing

Monitoring Solutions

  • Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
  • Network behavior analytics
  • Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compliance Considerations

Framework Requirement
PCI DSS Network security controls and monitoring
NIST Access control and system integrity
ISO 27001 Network security management

Conclusion

LLMNR poisoning remains a significant threat to Windows-based networks. Organizations must implement comprehensive security controls, including disabling unnecessary name resolution protocols, maintaining strong access controls, and deploying effective monitoring solutions. Regular security assessments and employee awareness training are essential components of a robust defense strategy against LLMNR-based attacks.

FAQs

  1. What is LLMNR Poisoning?
    LLMNR (Link-Local Multicast Name Resolution) Poisoning is an attack where a malicious actor responds to LLMNR name resolution requests, impersonating a legitimate network resource to capture authentication credentials.
  2. How does LLMNR Poisoning work?
    When a Windows system fails to resolve a hostname using DNS, it falls back to LLMNR. An attacker can listen for these requests and respond with their IP address, causing the victim’s system to send their NetNTLM hash to the attacker.
  3. What tools are commonly used for LLMNR Poisoning?
    Popular tools include Responder, Inveigh, and Metasploit’s auxiliary modules. Responder is the most widely used tool in penetration testing for LLMNR poisoning attacks.
  4. How can LLMNR Poisoning be detected?
    Detection can be achieved through network monitoring for suspicious LLMNR responses, analyzing Windows Event logs (Event ID 4697), and monitoring for unusual authentication attempts.
  5. What mitigations exist for LLMNR Poisoning?
    Mitigations include disabling LLMNR and NBT-NS in Group Policy, implementing strong network segmentation, requiring SMB signing, and using Network Access Control (NAC).
  6. What credentials can be captured through LLMNR Poisoning?
    LLMNR Poisoning can capture NetNTLM v1/v2 password hashes, which can then be cracked offline or used in relay attacks to authenticate to other services.
  7. Is LLMNR Poisoning limited to Windows environments?
    While LLMNR is primarily a Windows protocol, the attack can affect any system using LLMNR for name resolution, including some Linux distributions with LLMNR enabled.
  8. What’s the relationship between LLMNR Poisoning and SMB Relay attacks?
    LLMNR Poisoning is often used in conjunction with SMB Relay attacks, where captured NetNTLM hashes are immediately relayed to other systems for authentication, bypassing the need to crack the hash.
  9. How does LLMNR Poisoning differ from DNS Spoofing?
    LLMNR Poisoning targets the fallback name resolution protocol when DNS fails, while DNS Spoofing directly attacks the DNS resolution process by providing false DNS records.
  10. What network ports are involved in LLMNR Poisoning?
    LLMNR uses UDP port 5355 for name resolution queries, while the subsequent credential capture typically involves ports 445 (SMB) and 139 (NetBIOS).
Editor
Author: Editor

Related Posts

Tool Documentation Standards

documentation standards

Documentation standards ensure consistency, clarity, and effectiveness when recording findings during penetration testing engagements. Proper documentation helps security teams track vulnerabilities, communicate issues to stakeholders, and maintain an audit trail ... Read more

Testing Tool Integration

tool integration

Testing tool integration is a critical aspect of cybersecurity assessment that combines various security testing tools to create a more robust and comprehensive penetration testing workflow. Security professionals need efficient ... Read more

Automation Framework Design

automation framework

An automation framework streamlines and standardizes penetration testing processes, making security assessments more efficient and repeatable. Properly designed frameworks reduce manual effort while maintaining testing quality and consistency across different ... Read more

Exploitation Tool Development

tool development

Penetration testing tools require careful development to effectively identify security vulnerabilities in systems and networks. Security professionals need specialized exploitation tools that can safely simulate real-world attacks without causing damage. ... Read more

Security Tool Architecture

tool architecture

Security tool architecture forms the backbone of effective penetration testing, enabling security professionals to systematically probe systems for vulnerabilities. A well-structured security testing toolkit combines reconnaissance tools, vulnerability scanners, exploitation ... Read more

Build Server Security

build security

Security testing of build servers protects the foundation of software development and deployment processes from potential threats and vulnerabilities. Build servers handle sensitive data, access credentials, and control deployment pipelines, ... Read more

Secret Management

secrets management

Secret management stands as a cornerstone of cybersecurity, particularly during penetration testing operations where handling sensitive data requires meticulous care and precision. Penetration testers must safeguard various types of secrets ... Read more

Deployment Security

deployment security

Penetration testing during deployment phases helps organizations identify security vulnerabilities before applications go live. Security teams use automated and manual testing methods to simulate real-world attacks against newly deployed systems ... Read more